|
The AFC Uzbekistan Fund Class F shares returned +0.8% in June 2026 with a NAV of USD 2,075.65, bringing the year-to-date return to +37.3%. The return since inception (29th March 2019) now stands at +107.6%, representing an annualised return of +10.6% p.a.
UzNIF’s Shortfall is Excluding Private Companies with Above-Average Growth
The AFC Uzbekistan Fund’s focus from inception has been to be heavily weighted toward the blue-chips of Uzbekistan, which by nature host the best business moats and management. These have the highest probability of being the most successful compounders in the fast-growing Uzbek market as they continue to reinvest profits in their already dominant market positions. This compounding shows itself in return on equity multiples which range from the double digits to as high as the mid 30% range. At these growth rates, when share prices don’t react, we will witness “multiple compression”. Otherwise, we will see stock prices rise. The latter is the current phase we are in as market access and liquidity continue to improve, being the factor driving the fund’s 10 months’ positive performance. As we can easily foresee another 10-year-plus runway of strong, mid-single-digit economic growth in Uzbekistan, which will accelerate the country towards being the largest economy in Central Asia, overtaking Kazakhstan (something we used to be laughed at for, but which increasingly seems more probabilistic by the day), and therefore, the fund’s core holdings, which are private (not state-owned enterprises) should benefit handsomely.
Digging into the AFC Uzbekistan Fund’s holdings, it currently has 24 investments. The reality is that many of these are small tail positions built in the early days of the fund. Some of these positions have been liquidated over the years, while others we have decided to hold and increase when the opportunity has presented itself. Obviously, patience is required (a given fact for value investors like us) since we are inhibited by some of their small market caps where we do not want to move the share price.
Meanwhile, approximately 75% of the fund’s deployed capital is concentrated in our top four holdings where we see the most upside from both returns on invested capital, management maturity, and potential value unlocks for multi-bagger re-ratings ahead of us, such as maintaining monopolistic market positions, international IPO potential or strategic acquisitions or partnerships with multinational companies.
Therefore, when comparing the AFC Uzbekistan Fund to the Uzbekistan National Investment Fund (UZNF), which an investor can certainly do, and holding for several years, we expect a much greater upside in locally listed equities due to significant growth potential.
Additionally, for those positions which both the fund and UZNF hold, the fund’s torque is much greater. For example, Uzbek Commodity Exchange (TSE: URTS) is approximately only 3.5% of the UZNF NAV while it is arguably the best-run public company in Uzbekistan, trading at a P/E of 8.7x and a dividend yield of 9.3%. A 3.5% weight is a mere rounding error for UZNF, while it is currently 17% of the AFC Uzbekistan Fund. UZNF, which the AFC Uzbekistan Fund holds a position in, will certainly grind higher over the years as its NAV grows, but we believe the much larger opportunity is in the materials, consumer, financial services sectors (which UZNF isn’t as exposed to), as well as future private sector IPOs, of which the first may occur in 2027, and will be accessible through our exposure to local listings. Private sector IPOs are what we ultimately foresee as where we want to have the majority of the fund’s exposure, as this is where we see opportunities for above average returns.
Inflation Reaches a Record Low in May 2026
Inflation expectations among Uzbek households fell to 10.1% for the next 12 months in May 2026 — the lowest reading since the Central Bank of Uzbekistan began publishing the survey. This fall was in line with the CPI falling to 5.5% in May, down from 7% in April 2025, reaching the lowest level since Uzbekistan re-opened to the world in 2016, an impressive feat. Even more impressive is the fact that in 2016 vast swathes of the economy were heavily subsidised, from baking flour for bread, vegetable oil, electricity and water (much more heavily subsidised than today), and other parts of the economy. These subsidies have been largely unwound or are in the process of being so as the cost of goods and services moves toward and above the cost of production in order to incentivise new capital investment. While I do miss the days of USD $1 kebabs and 50-cent beers, as Uzbekistan is naturally not as cheap as during this subsidized regime, the economy is booming off of subsidies being wholly eliminated in some sectors and lifted annually in others, while headline CPI remains in a downtrend, as the below chart shows. While household inflation expectations remain elevated, this is largely due to volatility in foodstuffs where survey respondents noted that meat and dairy, fuel, and fruits and vegetables are the primary pain points.
With the Central Bank having pivoted to an inflation-targeted regime in 2016 and targeting single-digit inflation, which was delayed by several years due to continuous reforms and subsidies across the economy being removed, they are squarely on target. This should in due course allow the central bank policy rate to be lowered from 14% (very likely to have happened already if not for the war with Iran), thereafter negatively affecting interest rates (lower) on term deposits and new bond offerings, leading to continued interest in the equity market. We expect lower rates to also translate to more borrowing and a pickup in credit growth, which will further help stimulate the country’s already robust 2026 GDP growth expectation of between 6.4% and 7.9% depending on the organisation’s estimates one refers to.
This backdrop gives banks and corporate borrowers the opportunity to decrease their cost of capital. As has been the trend for several years, bank term deposits should continue to gravitate toward mid-teen percentage rates, while corporate bond offerings should increasingly occur in the high-teens. These are very attractive real rates, but are nonetheless falling relative to where they used to be. This should accelerate the attraction of the local equity market with companies like URTS with a nominal dividend yield of 9.25% (and a real yield of 3.75%) and the underlying annual growth of the business which has led to annual nominal increases in the dividend per share.
|