As such, the combination of likely higher near-term oil prices, continued strong oil export recovery, and the 13.3% devaluation of the dinar would substantially improve the government’s financial position for the year (budget table) and provide a measure of stability for the economy and foreign reserves – although reserves would still trend lower, albeit at a much slower rate.
The three positives of higher oil prices, continued strong oil export recovery, and the 13.3% devaluation of the dinar, while necessary, are not sufficient to sustain economic stability without addressing the budget’s structural imbalances of rigid expenditures and revenue volatility. Nevertheless, they have provided the government with breathing space to decide on fiscal reforms, in particular those that could come with an IMF programme, such as the Stand-By Arrangement (SBA) signed in 2016, or, better still, the more substantial Extended Fund Facility (EFF). Any IMF programme would face extreme resistance from the public and the political elite, who together rejected the White Paper for Economic Reform, which came in response to the financial crisis of 2020 and aimed to address the economy’s structural imbalances.§ That said, the continued need for debt to augment oil revenues, irrespective of the future direction of oil prices, requires the issuance of foreign debt in the form of Eurobonds, which would not come without an IMF programme, to supplement domestic debt – as the issuance of domestic debt on its own will continue the pressure on foreign reserves, while foreign debt will increase them.
Despite domestic resistance to an IMF programme, the proactive decision to devalue the dinar – breaking the historic head-in-the-sand pattern – signals the seriousness of the government’s tentative engagement with the Fund over recent months. That engagement has since solidified: at the close of the IMF–World Bank Annual Meetings in Bangkok on 17th October 2026, the IMF’s Managing Director confirmed that the authorities had requested a programme, pledging “both money and policy support”.
While such an engagement would likely take many months to conclude, the three positives outlined above have opened a window of up to a year for these discussions, as can be seen from the near-term implications of Brent crude prices under the assumption of continued oil export recovery. Current expectations imply an average Brent price of USD 92.5 per barrel (USD/bbl) for 2026, a projected average of USD 95.1/bbl for 2027, and USD 81.2/bbl for 2028, which, for Iraq under the current assumption of no-war/no-peace, means prices lower by about USD 32/bbl for the balance of 2026 and for 2027–2028. Assuming expenditures over the next two years are in line with those projected for 2026, this suggests that the budget’s deficit for 2027 could be better than that of 2026, but that the deficit for 2028 could be worse. In the short term, this would allow domestic debt to fund the deficit without significantly eroding reserves, while in the medium term foreign debt would be needed – all of which support the conclusion of an IMF programme.
Conclusion
The devaluation does not affect the high quality of the AFC Iraq Fund’s holdings or their long-term earnings growth, which should continue to drive its performance irrespective of any volatility that the next few months might bring. In fact, we believe that the devaluation has created an attractive entry point to participate in this long-term earnings growth. However, considerable risks remain, notably that the pause in the tit-for-tat attacks between the U.S. and Iran may collapse, reigniting a conflict that could escalate well beyond the control of the participants, both direct and indirect, and become an all-out war engulfing the region.
Notes
* Methodology: Projections for oil exports assume incremental month-on-month increases from September’s estimated levels. Blended oil prices for southern oil exports assume a discount of USD 32 per barrel (USD/bbl) to Brent crude prices, while northern oil exports assume a discount of USD 5/bbl to Brent (September reflects actual Brent spot prices; December reflects futures prices as of 16 October 2026; October and November are interpolated between the two). Budget oil revenues are derived from projected export receipts (0.44 × current month + 0.56 × two months earlier), less a 15% haircut, and converted at 1,461 IQD/USD in October and 1,500 IQD/USD in November–December. Projected non-oil revenues assume full-year growth of 16%, down from 24% year-on-year in January–August. Projected expenditures assume continued cost controls; each month’s projected expenditures are based on the average of the preceding three months and include oil capital expenditures (15% of oil revenues), which were minimal in January–August.
† Reserves are created when the Ministry of Finance (MoF) converts its dollar oil revenues into dinars: the Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) buys the dollars from the MoF and sells it the equivalent in dinars. Cross-border transfers, on the other hand, are the reverse transaction: the private sector, through the banks, sells dinars to the CBI and buys dollars from its reserves. Reserves therefore increase when the CBI buys more dollars from the MoF than it sells to the private sector, and decline when it sells more than it buys. See: (1) Ahmed Tabaqchali, “A Fistful of Dinars: Demystifying Iraq’s Dollar Auction,” LSE Middle East Centre, 18th April 2024, pp. 7–11,; (2) Ahmed Tabaqchali, “The Empire Strikes Back: Trump 2.0 and Iraq’s Dollar Accounts at the Federal Reserve,” LSE Middle East Centre Blog, 4th March 2025,
‡ Reserves as of the end of September, divided by the 18-month average of cross-border transfers, would cover at least 12 months of transfers. A CBI official at the MERI Forum in Erbil on 13th October 2026 stated that reserves cover Iraq’s imports for a year or more. See: Al-Mada, “Central Bank: Our Foreign Reserves Cover Iraq’s Imports for a Full Year or More” (in Arabic), 14th October 2026
§ Ahmed Tabaqchali, “Missed Opportunities for Economic Reform,” in Iraq 20 Years On: Insider Reflections on the War and Its Aftermath, Chatham House, 4th May 2023,
|